More on the #ATAR, @birmo looks to the Higher Education Standards Panel
Posted: February 11, 2016 Filed under: Education | Tags: advocacy, ATAR, authenticity, community, education, educational problem, educational research, ethics, higher education, reflection, resources, tertiary admittance, tools 1 CommentThe Federal Education Minister, Senator Simon Birmingham, appears as concerned over the disconnect between the Australian Tertiary Admission Rank (ATAR) and university entry as I am. In his own words, students must have “a clear understanding of what they need to do to get into their course of choice and realising what will be expected of them through their further study.”
This article covers some of the issues already raised over transparency and having a system that people work with rather than around.
“While universities determine their own admission requirements, exploring greater transparency measures will ensure that Australian students are provided real information on what they need to do to be admitted to a course at a particular institution and universities are held to account for their public entry requirements,” Senator Birmingham said.
Ensuring that students are ready for university but it’s increasingly obvious that this role is not supported or validated through the current ATAR system, for a large number of students. I look forward to see what comes from the standards panel and I hope that it’s to everyone’s benefit, not just a rejigging of a number that was probably never all that representative to start with.

Senator Birmingham, Minister Pyne, Professor Bebbington (VC of Adelaide) and A/Prof Katrina Falkner with one of the Bright Spark participants.
Perhaps I should confess that I would like a system where any student could get into University (or VET or TAFE or whatever tertiary program they want to) but that we build our preparatory and educational systems to support this happening, rather than just bringing people in to watch them fail. Oh, but a boy can dream.
Just recently our university relaxed an old entrance requirement and it caused a stir (albeit one loaded with emotions about standards) .it used to be that you could enter with 5 subjects at 1 or 2 sitting at the Caribbean high school exam (csec). If you had 5 at more than 2 sitting then an entrance exam was the alternative route. The university now accepts 5 subjects at any number of sitting
Like you i think first year uni could/should be set up to help someone with a level of entry that might not be the norm to catch up to what is required and to progress thereafter
LikeLike